SAP TechEd Munich - preamble
Off I am to another of these most excellent SAP bashes, as a blogger no less. Of all the conferences I go to those are among my favourites, simply because I'm put smack in the middle of some of the most knowledgeable Enterprise Software folks existing.
Tomorrow there's a full day with all the developers - SAPpies and customers - under the auspices of the SAP developer network (SDN) and the business process network (BPX) - my kind of fun that! Then two days roaming and meeting executives and customers and partners and...ahh, excellent.
Huge kudos to SAP letting us roam freely to talk to their developers and executives but also to their partners and customers - a huge learning experience. And of course, kudos for making it possible by covering our costs - we bloggers are not earning money from blogging, so any travel goes off the wine budget which is always hard ;) Thank you SAP, it shows self-confidence to let us in as you do.
But I also enter these things with much respect, knowing that I'm a mere novice in Enterprise Software.
The bloggers attending - many of which are fellow Enterprise Irregulars - have a combined experience in that field that I would not even be able to gather over many lifetimes, so this time I'm planning to focus on a few issues that is close to my heart. Perhaps not (yet?) close to SAP's heart, but we'll see:
Semantic methods - I hear Oracle, HP and IBM among many others are dabbling in this area - do SAP sniff and even do any research here? A search on their web site yields little or nothing.
Barely repeatable processes - as you know one of my favourite areas, the ongoing within any organisation that is not covered by the ubiquitous process software like ERP, CRM, HCM and the like. The stuff that take up most of your day. Kind of important that. What plans or activities do SAP have here?
Intentional organisational changes - as mentioned by Michael in his most enjoyable post here - "ERP implementations are intended to expose how an organization operates, which helps streamline and standardize processes". This is something I agree with strongly, and I see it as a huge boon, not a negative as many see it.
I am afraid that most organisations forget that "the way they do things today" once upon time came to life precisely because of some technology, or rather limitations to that former technology. Often that former technology was "pen and paper" so most think "it's supposed to be like that, the way we do it is natural and the default"! A kick in the butt is not always a bad thing.
So do SAP "play this effect down" or do they actively enhance the good part of it?
So I'm packing my notebook and have sharpened my pencils - really looking forward to it! Report to follow.
If you have an issue that I should study further when in the lions den, please suggest, I'll be happy to stick my head out!







Sig,
Listeners Choice:
1) How can SAP make Enterprise and (especially) Small Biz more Mashable? [Assumption: Making your biz Mashable as a strategy will 1) enhance capacity utilization, 2) help as a efficient, low cost biz development method]
2) How can SAP users increase the 'Serendipity' within their supplier and customer community?
More detailed discussion on this by my customer at:
http://www.upsl.info/wp/2007/09/18/sap-global-surveyrolling-with-wiki-mashup-and-machinima/
[Aside, If you keenly watch, you will see Thingamy logo in the Push vs Pull video in the link above!]
Posted by:Balaji Sowmyanarayan | October 15, 2007 at 10:12 AM
Balaji, issues added to my list!
Hey, how cool, I could see the "logo"!
UPDATE: Allow me to "bake" your two questions into mine as follows:
1) If the systems were able to handle "barely repeatable processes", well then I'm sure it also includes flexibility and small business capability. As you know, I'm not that into "mashable" as we tinker with a more holistic approach were mashing up existing apps does not make it...
2) Serendipity requires (at least!) easy availability of data, flexibility (see 1) and perhaps most important - provocation! Think I will get to that through my three questions. But will expand if necessary when prodding around!
Posted by:sig | October 15, 2007 at 10:16 AM
Sig,
Nicely put - data flexibility and sexing it up ( add- sans consultants? ) is the way to go!
Let me clarify the mashable in my wish list bit: I'm talking about mashability of the (small) biz as such rather than the mashing of apps within the biz.
An ERP package can help selectively expose parts of workflow as API. Perhaps the most basic commodity offering's workflow can be exposed as API. Now it is no longer a commodity offering. The API will (potentially)be consumed by an off beat user and Ta Da! The off beat user got what she wanted without friction. And the (small) biz got a new customer doing nothing - and their capacity got utilized. Thus API is the new shop window with an instant checkout! An ERP software can (potentially) open a handful or hundreds of shop windows just by turning a few knobs and dials.
For instance, for my customer in printing industry, API exposing their commodity offering viz., biz card repeat printing (order) workflow, will save everyone involved a lot of hassles.
SAP as someone who has an handle on the inside workflow and as someone who 'Gets' the outside(net/web, the fast changing social media landscape for instance) is in best position to bake in (small biz)API exposure as part of the product.
In short, an ERP software has a potential to democratize the API wave. My question: Is the lion still busy being an API pimp rather than an API publishing game changer?
Posted by:Balaji Sowmyanarayan | October 15, 2007 at 08:21 PM