Hugh, seems we have a parallel experience here!
"The phrase I can't get out my head is "Cultural Transformation"!"
So I ask myself - what's the difference between "brand management" and "process management"?
None.
Both is all about "what value are you going to deliver to what customer and how are you going to use your resources to attain that and keep some of it for yourself?"
In other words - strategy (path forward) and business model (execution).
And that's what I end up discussing when at end-users, take that strategy and execute with no fuss - actually little specific "let's increase our efficiency" talk.
And that's good, how many percent (or rather per mille) are there to fetch in that department by IT vendors?
Nope. The cultural shift in the IT and the marketing department is to focus on value creation and a "factor of ten"!
And what could be better I ask... :D
You're right. This all arises from a misconception of what marketing really is (a misconception held by many marketing people as well as lots of non-marketers). Promotion which most people confuse with marketing is only a small part of the whole thing - the most important part of which is the product/service.
Start here http://makemarketinghistory.blogspot.com/2006/04/branding-myth.html
Posted by: john dodds | May 24, 2006 at 18:40
re: "what value are you going to deliver to what customer and how are you going to use your resources to attain that and keep some of it for yourself?"
How about "how are you going to use your resources to create value, and how are you going to share it with others?"
Probably not commercial enough, eh?
Posted by: Milan Davidovic | May 25, 2006 at 19:54
Milan, of course - two ways of saying the same - sharing indeed includes some for me :)
When you create value - some to customer, he's happy, then keep a "share" for yourself - voila all happy, sustainable business and absolutely quite commercial as well as altruistic in essence ;)
Posted by: sig | May 25, 2006 at 20:12
re: two ways of saying the same
Okay, I can see how you can see it that way. To me, your way is "create for others, keep some for self"; mine is "create for self, share with anyone else who happens to be interested". Hence my remark about "not commercial enough".
But maybe if you feel enough "oneness" with the rest of the world, there really is no difference.
At any rate, your post really got me thinking; many thanks for that.
Posted by: Milan Davidovic | May 26, 2006 at 15:26